Is he back?
|
d0dger Posted Apr 5, 2011, 3:31 am |
I saw Studman/Shark signed up for an event today... was his ban not permanent? | ||||||
|
Jeelz Posted Apr 5, 2011, 7:30 am |
Lol - he's just in time! | ||||||
|
*sam* Posted Apr 5, 2011, 8:41 am |
Studman was never actually banned. Substantial anti-griefing code was put in place because of him though.. | ||||||
|
*Grograt* gary.r.horder@gmail.com Posted Apr 5, 2011, 9:29 am |
LOL his forum scanner must have been going ping ping ping with all the PVP mentions of late.
well there goes the neighborhood |
||||||
|
johnny go Posted Apr 5, 2011, 9:44 am |
be carm ,
the sock pooper is only a threat to players who dont know about him. if you see him in the lobby give a heads up to any newer players(like the ham gang) and he will soon get bored and go away again. the more we all start ranting and raving about him the more he likes it and the longer he will stay |
||||||
|
*goat starer* Posted Apr 5, 2011, 1:54 pm |
ONE player gets the game ruined for everyone... always the way. I refuse to believe coding is ever the answer to griefing |
||||||
|
JS Posted Apr 5, 2011, 2:04 pm |
+1 |
||||||
|
Joel Autobaun Posted Apr 5, 2011, 2:09 pm |
LOL the anti griefing code has killed more newbs then shark ever will. Shark's garage is pretty loaded....if he has an active alt all this time I'd say it finally worthy of ban. Also suspicious he shows up just as BL goes full open pvp, just in time to ruin it for everyone again... |
||||||
|
theHumungous Posted Apr 5, 2011, 4:52 pm |
Shark isn't a fantastic PVP player you know. And if he's limited to the 'studman' account then he really isn't a huge threat.
The fights I've seen him win, he only won by fighting dirty (with squad challenges where he takes about 50% more CR than agreed). The 'studman' gangers are fairly low skill gangers. Of course, he doesn't care if they die so that's where he's most dangerous. Pretty much any player that has played a bit in the SCL should be able to handle him fairly well. At least, that's from what I've seen of him. |
||||||
|
*Rezeak* reecestensel@hotmail.co.uk Posted Apr 5, 2011, 4:54 pm |
Self policing community.
You're giving him more notoriety than he deserves. |
||||||
|
theHumungous Posted Apr 5, 2011, 4:59 pm |
Well, Rez said what I said, but in much less text. lol.
My cars have guns on them. Come get me. (once I start playing again - hahaha). |
||||||
|
*goat starer* Posted Apr 5, 2011, 5:05 pm |
personally i am delighted if there is a valid target runni8ng around! 
|
||||||
|
Kornkob The Dude Posted Apr 5, 2011, 5:07 pm |
Get him, Goat! 
|
||||||
|
triad4evr Posted Apr 5, 2011, 10:53 pm |
Is that really it? With 100 or so people with PvP flag enabled, you guys really can't find anybody to fight?
For the record, I'm sure shark/studman would be just fine with attacking in PvP somebody that is totally unprepared, so even if he is a sucky PvPer, he's the kind of guy that's going to want to force everybody to do it, so he can take advantage of them. He wouldn't want a fair fight. |
||||||
|
*Longo* Posted Apr 5, 2011, 11:04 pm |
He's a loozer. Quit talking about him. He's a coward too. 
|
||||||
|
Joel Autobaun Posted Apr 5, 2011, 11:48 pm |
He is one of the reasons PvP is so fkin screwed right now and must be punished. |
||||||
|
Jake Nikodemus Posted Apr 6, 2011, 2:32 am |
Self-policing didn't work with shark/stud, thats why the code was added and the PvP flag right???? SO why will self-policing work now?
Joel, are you blaming triad for PvP being screwed up or shark? Not sure to whom your pronoun is referrring. And what's to stop anyone from griefing? Isn't it clear that Sam is more than willing to tolerate it regardless of what the community desires? Serioulsy, it was Sam that called that style of play griefing, and now we find that griefers won't be banned at all. Does this mean that we are now testing the anti-griefing code? Seems like with things wide open now we are back to the issue spanky spoke at length about: Is it not a valid option to play your gang as "evil"? |
||||||
|
Joel Autobaun Posted Apr 6, 2011, 2:37 am |
Shark declared "war" on everyone ...dishonorably using a loophole in Sam's "rules". Sam Honorably held to his rules, but put in the anti-shark code to stop his grief in town events (it worked, but a little too well in my opinion). Technically Sam couldn't "ban" him and I think that shows what a great person Sam is...cause I probably would have done and IPlookup/yellowpages on the credit card name and opened up a can of real world BAS RUTTEN on his ass if it was me.
Triad? who the fk cares? |
||||||
|
*Bastille* Posted Apr 6, 2011, 2:52 am |
BAS what!?! what did I do 
|
||||||
|
*Rev. V* Posted Apr 6, 2011, 2:53 am |
You know exactly what you did Bastiel!!! 
|
||||||
|
*Bastille* Posted Apr 6, 2011, 2:55 am |
dang, I thought no one noticed |
||||||
|
JS Posted Apr 6, 2011, 1:00 pm |
you RUTTEN-ed everything! | ||||||
|
*Grograt* gary.r.horder@gmail.com Posted Apr 6, 2011, 2:11 pm |
Locked due to nature of discussion |