Barbu Posted Oct 14, 2009, 5:24 am	Just asking a question, why is the combat league an average instead of points? It just sounds weird that a one time battle winner can have a higher standing than those who got first on 3 battle and third in only one. Thanks for taking to time to reply! =)
Marrkos Posted Oct 14, 2009, 5:32 am	Somerset Combat League, yes? Quote: This balances players who have lots of time to play with those that don't. Without the average, the players who could enter every event could completely blow out the players who could only enter one event a week. As noted from the league description, it is an attempt to provide some parity between the folks who can play a ton, and those who can't. It has issues, of course, the main one being that it rewards people not playing, especially if they do really well (place 1st) in an event early in the week. Ideas about how to improve it are always welcome, but do a search of the forum for something like 'league points' so you can get an idea about the stuff that has come before.
Barbu Posted Oct 14, 2009, 5:39 am	Yes Somerset combat league, sorry i didn't point that out. And what about an average of the in combat points? I think that would be more balanced than the way it is now. EDIT: Or maybe amount of cars you demoralized, but ''kill stealing'' would be a problem. Just telling my ideas.
Marrkos Posted Oct 14, 2009, 5:59 am	Barbu said: Yes Somerset combat league, sorry i didn't point that out. And what about an average of the in combat points? I think that would be more balanced than the way it is now. EDIT: Or maybe amount of cars you demoralized, but ''kill stealing'' would be a problem. Just telling my ideas. Dunno. Kick it over to Suggestions and see what kind of discussion develops.
Barbu Posted Oct 14, 2009, 6:19 am	Thanks for the feedback! Posting in the suggestions section right away, i'll lock the thread.