POLL - PvP Regional in DW? (56 Votes)
Yes	44.64% - 25 votes
No	42.86% - 24 votes
Other(Please explain)	12.5% - 7 votes

Pages: << prev 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... next >>

POLL - PvP Regional in DW?

*Longo* Longos Merry Men Darkwind Guru Mutants Faction Group: Marshals Posts: 6,659 Joined: Dec 15, 2007 Request by Lord F to make this another poll with goat's changes. - keep SS PVP free - Make the PvP flag operate in Elms, GW, Texan and Sars - Make everyone open for PVP in BL, Shanty and FL ......................... vet combatL1 ped1 paintladder semiprocombat ped2 wv pvp4 pvp1 gwped paintball pvp3 pvp5 slay2013 marshal circuit2 combat1 e2g raceL1 gwextrav gateautumn pvp2 triangle1 Posted Mar 31, 2011, 4:11 am

Ragnak Ragnaks Reavers Autodueller Renegade Group: Members Posts: 315 Joined: Jul 7, 2010 Making regions or area's of conflicts works well for lots of games, I would only suggest that the PVP region not cut in half the PVE region. PVP should probably be open in Firelight, Sars, and Texan. ......................... vet wv Posted Mar 31, 2011, 6:17 am Last edited Mar 31, 2011, 6:17 am by Ragnak

fleau crass ta feraille Sunday Driver Renegade Group: Members Posts: 58 Joined: Oct 1, 2009 Same as Ragnak ......................... vet wv Posted Mar 31, 2011, 7:24 am

*Rezeak* The Dark Knights Darkwind Guru Deathrace Mafia Faction Group: Marshals + Storytellers Posts: 2,377 Joined: Aug 8, 2009 Ragnak said: Making regions or area's of conflicts works well for lots of games, I would only suggest that the PVP region not cut in half the PVE region. PVP should probably be open in Firelight, Sars, and Texan. The problem with this is that it'd just end up like Shanty. That's open PvP and yet PvP doesn't get done there because there aren't enough players there. In order for this to work one of the big player towns should be included in the PvP zone (Badlands, IMO) ......................... vet wv deathrceL1 marshal pvp2 zom pvp3 Posted Mar 31, 2011, 7:30 am

johnny go rancid Darkwind Guru Renegade Group: Members Posts: 1,438 Joined: Mar 24, 2010 sounds like a plan, after SS badlands is the most populated town. its also a town that gives some of the best loot in the game, sounds like the perfect candidate for PvPing up. i for one relish the opertunaty to runlike a girl from a wide variety of my fellow players :-) ......................... vet wv Posted Mar 31, 2011, 7:58 am

*sam* The Salthill Sluggerz Darkwind Guru Renegade Group: Lead Developer Posts: 16,780 Joined: Jan 19, 2006 I like the idea too. Maybe it could be implemented with the specific caveat that we hold another poll in say 2 weeks time, after people see how it has panned out, in order to decide if we want to keep the change or not. ......................... marshal vet deathrce1 paintladder combat1 wv ped1 cont slay2013 Posted Mar 31, 2011, 9:39 am

fleau crass ta feraille Sunday Driver Renegade Group: Members Posts: 58 Joined: Oct 1, 2009 I do not feel ready for pvping, so please let me just the time to bring back my BL stuff to GW (need a few days). ......................... vet wv Posted Mar 31, 2011, 9:53 am

FireFly Anarcho-Pumpkin Privateers Darkwind Guru Renegade Group: Members Posts: 5,468 Joined: Mar 3, 2008 I'd vote for this change but... ... Really, I cant see anyone playing the antagonist when you'll just get bullied out of the game if you do, I'm all for open PvP but the community itself really refuses to support it, even the Pro PvP players will shut out an antagonistic PvP player. As I said before, the DW playerbase is just to small, since everyone knows eachother by name everything is just so... personal And here is the funny part, if you are planning to attack someone that does not currently have the PvP flag on, it means attacking somewho who wants nothing to do with PvP... meaning you are one of those antag PvP players, this guy will tell his buddies you are the new shark, and so on... Good luck finding as many SS scouts as you did before after that ......................... vet wv zom gateautumn deathrceL1 elmsautumn pvp1 pvp2 sssc raceL1 e2g combatL1 santa1 pvp3 gwextrav ww circuit32,18,0 Posted Mar 31, 2011, 9:58 am Last edited Mar 31, 2011, 10:00 am by FireFly

*SirLatte* Road Templars Darkwind Guru Deathrace Mafia Faction Group: Marshals Posts: 509 Joined: Jun 22, 2010 I would just suggest that if BL become PVP with no option that we make Gw or Elms much harder with much better chance of getting loot so people have a place to play with out threat. I voted Yes ......................... marshal vet wv pvp1 zom paintladder paintball elmsautumn raceL1 ped2 circuit2 ped1 gwped Posted Mar 31, 2011, 12:28 pm

*Tinker* BibleThumpers Anonymous Darkwind Guru Mutants Faction Group: Marshals + Contributors Posts: 4,546 Joined: Aug 1, 2008 voted no, think people need on option besides staying in the north to be PvP safe and the time constraints reason, also there just isn't that many people leaving SS, but I'll roll with it if it's what people want Oh yeah forgot you can always pay the piper and truce it. so disregard my vote ......................... vet marshal wv pvp3 zom circuit2 pvp1 cont Posted Mar 31, 2011, 12:46 pm

Kornkob The Dude Urban Achievers Darkwind Guru Renegade Group: Members Posts: 1,022 Joined: Jan 10, 2010 *sam* said: I like the idea too. Maybe it could be implemented with the specific caveat that we hold another poll in say 2 weeks time, after people see how it has panned out, in order to decide if we want to keep the change or not. It might help facilitate rational discussion if you could also pull data out of the game after that 2 weeks to show how many PvP events actually occurred and how much gear/gangers were lost (not naming gangs--- aggregated data). ......................... vet wv Posted Mar 31, 2011, 1:38 pm

*goat starer* Special Circumstances Darkwind Guru Evan Reds Faction Group: Contributors Posts: 10,907 Joined: Oct 29, 2007 I voted Other... All PVP open or nothing... you should not be able to pick and choose bits of the game when it is essentially competitive. those ideas are not 'goat's changes' they are a watered down concept i came up with because I am fed up of banging my head against a brick wall. They don't reflect my views at all. ......................... vet wv zom pvp4 cont community deathrceL1 marshal pvp3 pvp2 Posted Mar 31, 2011, 1:38 pm Last edited Mar 31, 2011, 1:45 pm by goat starer

Groove Champion The Groove Champions Darkwind Guru Renegade Group: Members Posts: 4,813 Joined: Sep 16, 2008 Voted 'Other': Will play regardless of what is decided. ......................... vet combatL1 wv cont0,5,0 Posted Mar 31, 2011, 4:39 pm

Cadimus Ordo Nox Racer Renegade Group: Members Posts: 174 Joined: Jan 14, 2011 I'm for leaving it as it is. We have one open PVP town and the pvp flag option for everywhere else. No one should be forced to pvp if they don't want to. ......................... vet wv Posted Mar 31, 2011, 6:04 pm

Crazy AL Street Pizza Darkwind Guru Merchants Faction Group: Members Posts: 1,228 Joined: Feb 14, 2008 *SirLatte* said: I would just suggest that if BL become PVP with no option that we make Gw or Elms much harder with much better chance of getting loot so people have a place to play with out threat. I voted Yes I like this and I also voted yes, btw. ......................... vet wv zom pvp1 ped1 Posted Mar 31, 2011, 6:10 pm

Juris Hessians Darkwind Guru Deathrace Mafia Faction Group: Members Posts: 1,706 Joined: Sep 16, 2010 Voted 'other' because it would further divide the game, this time geographically N and S. What FF said is also true. What Groove said about playing either way, this 'change' will make no difference to me. ......................... vet wv pvp1 pvp5 pvp4 race1 zom pvp2 deathrce1 pvp3 combat1 Posted Mar 31, 2011, 6:28 pm

Joel Autobaun Joels Bastards Darkwind Guru Deathrace Mafia Faction Group: Sinbinned Posts: 4,598 Joined: Nov 10, 2008 Voted yes. I bet no one will notice this change for a while after implemented. ......................... vet northernsummer deathrce1 raceL1 deathrceL1 ww ped1 sssc paintball semiprocombat ped2 e2g gwextrav gwped combat1 paintladder elmsautumn gateautumn wv race1 combatL1 pvp1 pvp5 pvp4 zom pvp3 circuit1 pvp2 circuit2 circuit3 ss2fl67 slay2013 storm2013 geek triangle198,96,31 Posted Mar 31, 2011, 8:16 pm

*goat starer* Special Circumstances Darkwind Guru Evan Reds Faction Group: Contributors Posts: 10,907 Joined: Oct 29, 2007 Cadimus said: I'm for leaving it as it is.  We have one open PVP town and the pvp flag option for everywhere else. No one should be forced to pvp if they don't want to. you should not be able to pick and choose bits of the game when  it is essentially competitive. ......................... vet wv zom pvp4 cont community deathrceL1 marshal pvp3 pvp2 Posted Mar 31, 2011, 8:16 pm

*jimmylogan* MADHAT Darkwind Guru Civs Faction Group: Marshals + Rule Council Posts: 5,587 Joined: Jun 11, 2008 voted yes - I'm not an antag PvP and I think people SHOULD be able to pick and choose bits of the game that being said, I think this is a good move in a positive way, since the general understanding is that it will be readdressed in a few weeks ......................... vet marshal deathrceL1 wv community combatL1 Posted Mar 31, 2011, 8:52 pm

*Tango* 2ManyRads CI Darkwind Guru Deathrace Mafia Faction Group: Marshals Posts: 2,543 Joined: Mar 21, 2010 I voted against it, unless specs are taken into account CR matching it would be a tool for people with uber gangers to harass players without. I don't care if you can bounty out, it's still a time grief and a money grief. I have to agree with FF that PVP outside of SCL is essentially broken. You're forced to trust that someone you come up against doesn't have a vendetta or has been paid off to kill your gangers. Because of permadeath I don't wanna risk my assets in a competition that I have no chance to win. I don't play the games at the carnival midway because they are rigged. If this aspect of PVP ever got changed I'd be more open to it. ......................... marshal vet wv pvp5 pvp4 combat1 pvp3 zom community Posted Mar 31, 2011, 9:12 pm

Pages: << prev 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... next >>

Powered by MercuryBoard [v1.1.4]
© 2001-2005 The Mercury Development Team

0.1217 seconds - 33 queries - 0.56 load